Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

The Correlation of Perceptions of Professional Roles and Teacher Beliefs with the Quality of Teacher Interaction 

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 1, Issue 2, May 2018, pp. 207-227
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 640 DOWNLOADS: 306 Publication date: 15 May 2018
ABSTRACT
The literature and research results suggest that teachers' behavior in the classroom is under the strong influence of teachers' beliefs about their own role in the educational process. The aim of this study was to examine the perception of teacher's professional roles and teacher's beliefs about teaching, and their correlation with the quality of teacher interaction. The study was conducted on a sample of 99 primary school teachers. The perception of the role of teachers and pupils was examined by the metaphor technique, and the Approaches to Teaching Inventory and Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction were applied. The results show that teacher beliefs differ depending on the research approach. The qualitative approach shows a dominant protective - traditional orientation in understanding the role of a teacher, and a typical traditional orientation in understanding the role of pupils, while the quantitative approach based on teacher self-assessments points to the dominance of the constructivist approach focused on the pupil. There was also a weak correlation between teacher beliefs and teacher interpersonal behavior, which is considered in the context of data collection technique, teacher self-assessments.
KEYWORDS
Teacher professional identity, teacher beliefs, quality of teacher interaction
CITATION (APA)
Šašić, S. Š., Šimunić, A., Ivković, A., & Ključe, A. (2018). The Correlation of Perceptions of Professional Roles and Teacher Beliefs with the Quality of Teacher Interaction . Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.125
REFERENCES
  1. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-pupil relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.
  2. Domović, V. (2011). Učiteljska profesija i profesionalni identitet učitelja [The teaching profession and professional identity of teachers]. In: V. Vizek Vidović (Ed.), Učitelji i njihovi mentori. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja.
  3. Domović, V. & Vizek Vidović, V. (2013). Uvjerenja studentica učiteljskog fakulteta o ulozi učitelja, učenika i poučavanju [The beliefs of female pupils of the Faculty of teaching on the role of teachers, pupils, and teaching]. Sociologija i prostor, 197(3), 493-508. Doi 10.5673/sip.51.3.3
  4. Duru, S. (2015). A metaphor analysis of elementary student teachers' conceptions of teachers in student- and teacher-centered contexts. Euroasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 281-300. Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2015.60.16
  5. Kaye, L.K. & Brewer, G. (2013). Teacher and pupil-focused approaches: Influence of learning approach and self-efficacy in a psychology postgraduate sample psychology. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 12-19. Doi 10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.12
  6. Khine, M. S. & Atputhasamy, L. (2005). Self-perceived and students' perceptions of teacher interaction in the classrooms. Singapore: Paper presented at the Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy; Research, Policy, Practice.
  7. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2013). In search of the essence of good teacher: Toward a more holistic approach in teacher education. In: C.J. Craig, P.C. Meijer & J. Broeckmans (Eds.), From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: the evolution of a research community (Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume 19, p.p. 241-273). Emerald group publishing limited.
  8. Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher Education pupils' attitudes to pupil-centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321–334. Doi.org/10.1080/03075070309293
  9. Martinez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965–977. Doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9
  10. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  11. Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers` conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123–139. doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003
  12. Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher’ In: Denicolo, P. & Kompf, M. (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5-21). Oxford: Routledge.
  13. Schreurs, J. & Dumbraveanu, R. (2014). A shift from teacher centered to learner centered approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), 36-41. Doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3395
  14. Šimić Šašić, S. (2012). Kvaliteta interakcije nastavnika i učenika na različitim razinama obrazovanja [The quality of the interaction of teachers and pupils at different education levels]. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Zagreb, Croatia.
  15. Šimić Šašić, S. & Klarin, M. (2017). Social interactions as self-esteem predictors in young boys and girls of two countries. In: I. Burić (Ed.), 20th Psychology Days in Zadar - Book of Selected Proceedings (pp. 235-246), Zadar: University of Zadar, Department of Psychology.
  16. Thomas, M. (2013). Teachers' beliefs about classroom teaching-teachers' knowledge and teaching approaches. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 31-39. Doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.805
  17. Trigwell, K. (2012). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science, 40(3), 607–621. Doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9192-3
  18. Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424. Doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
  19. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and pupils’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70. Doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194
  20. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., Brok, P., & Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In: C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1161-1191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  21. Wubbels, T. & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-pupil relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1-2), 6-24. Doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003
  22. Wubbels, T., Creton, H., Levy, J., & Hooymayers, H. (1993). The model for interpersonal teacher behavior. In: T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? (pp. 11-26) London: The Falmer Press.
  23. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. (1993). Comparison of teachers' and pupils' percepcions of interpersonal teacher behavior. In: T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? (pp. 57-72). London: The Folmer Press.
  24. Wubbels, T., Creton, H.A., & Hooymayers, H.P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers, interactional teacher behaviour mapped out. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License