Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Improving STEM Education through Resource Activation: A Study of Culturally Relevant Teaching for Critical Data Literacy in a High School Science Classroom

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Online-First Articles, pp. 1-26
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 103 DOWNLOADS: 487 Publication date: 15 Jun 2024
ABSTRACT
Interest in promoting data literacy among K-12 students has grown, driven by the need to cultivate skills in using data effectively across various fields of study. Integrating discipline-specific curricula, like bioinformatics, which merges biology and informatics, can broaden student engagement in STEM. While earlier efforts focused on technical data skills, recent research emphasizes a sociocultural approach to encourage critical data literacy, aligning with culturally relevant teaching (CRT). This study investigates a teacher's instructional practices for CRT in prompting critical data literacy. We used a resource activation framework that aims to explore the ways in which a teacher utilized material resources (tangible objects and tools), cultural resources (knowledge and skills), social resources (interactions and relationships), and symbolic resources (recognition and prestige). We worked with a science teacher, Tracy, who activated resources to adapt and teach a bioinformatics problem-based learning curriculum rooted in real-world problem-solving in STEM, connecting students with community issues, such as asthma and air quality. We deductively analyzed classroom observation notes, interviews, and recordings of the professional development workshop sessions. We found that during the curriculum implementation, Tracy activated cultural and social resources to enable access to other resources that were not readily available. Our findings suggest that the activation of cultural and social resources concurrently allowed the teacher to address diverse student needs, foster relevance and engagement, collaborate with colleagues, and continuously enhance their teaching practices. Ultimately, activating all four resources empowers teachers to provide high-quality instruction, leading to improved overall STEM education.
KEYWORDS
Resource Activation, Culturally Relevant Teaching, STEM Integration, Data Literacy
CITATION (APA)
Shim, J., & Yoon, S. A. (2024). Improving STEM Education through Resource Activation: A Study of Culturally Relevant Teaching for Critical Data Literacy in a High School Science Classroom. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.311SI
REFERENCES
  1. Adiredja, A. P. (2019). Anti-deficit narratives: Engaging the politics of research on mathematical sense making. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(4), 401-435. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0401
  2. Bain, S. A., Plaisier, H., Anderson, F., Cook, N., Crouch, K., Meagher, T. R., Ritchie, G. M., Wallace, E. W. J., & Barker, D. (2022). Bringing bioinformatics to schools with the 4273pi project. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(1), e1009705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009705
  3. Barron, H. A., Brown, J. C., & Cotner, S. (2021). The culturally responsive science teaching practices of undergraduate biology teaching assistants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(9), 1320-1358. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21711
  4. Brown-Jeffy, S., & Cooper, J. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 65-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479642
  5. Bryant-Stephens, T., West, C., Dirl, C., Banks, T., Briggs, V., & Rosenthal, M. (2012). Asthma prevalence in Philadelphia: description of two community-based methodologies to assess asthma prevalence in an inner-city population. Journal of Asthma, 49(6), 581-585. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2012.690476
  6. Carlson, J., Fosmire, M., Miller, C. C., & Sapp Nelson, M. (2011). Determining data information literacy needs: a study of students and research faculty. Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 629–657. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0022
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
  8. Dhunpath, R. (2000). Life history methodology: “narradigm” regained. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156459
  9. Diamond, B. S., Maerten‐Rivera, J., Rohrer, R. E., & Lee, O. (2014). Effectiveness of a curricular and professional development intervention at improving elementary teachers’ science content knowledge and student achievement outcomes: Year 1 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 635-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21148
  10. Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Comment: Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0310080
  11. Fischer, C., Fishman, B., Dede, C., Eisenkraft, A., Frumin, K., Foster, B., Lawrenz, F., Levy, A. J., & McCoy, A. (2018). Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.011
  12. Ganesan, N., & Leong, K. E. (2020). Impact of Fathom on Statistical Reasoning among Upper Secondary Students. Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(2), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.321
  13. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
  14. Gebre, E. H. (2018). Young adults’ understanding and use of data: Insights for fostering secondary school students’ data literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18, 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0034-z
  15. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014-2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.002
  16. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037
  17. Gutiérrez, K. D. & Johnson, P. (2017). Understanding identity sampling and cultural repertoires: Advancing and historicizing a syncretic system of teaching and learning in justice pedagogies. In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds) Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World (pp. 247-260). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  18. Institute of Education Sciences (IES) & National Science Foundation (NSF). (2013). Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
  19. Johnson, C. C. (2011). The road to culturally relevant science: Exploring how teachers navigate change in pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 170-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20405
  20. Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition (pp. 1-50). Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved March 12, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/
  21. Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146-151.
  22. Kafai, Y., Fields, D., & Searle, K. A. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532–557. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211057904
  23. Kovarik, D. N., Patterson, D. G., Cohen, C., Sanders, E. A., Peterson, K. A., Porter, S. G., & Chowning, J. T. (2013). Bioinformatics education in high school: Implications for promoting science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0193
  24. Kulikowski, C. A., Shortliffe, E. H., Currie, L. M., Elkin, P. L., Hunter, L. E., Johnson, T. R., Kalet, I. J., Lanert, L. A., Musen, M. A., Ozbolt, J., G., Smith, J. W., Tarczy-Hornoch, P. Z., & Williamson, J. J. (2012). AMIA Board white paper: Definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(6), 931-938. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001053
  25. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283120320034
  26. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Fighting for our lives: Preparing teachers to teach African American students. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003008
  27. Ladson-Billings, G. (2016). And then there is this thing called the curriculum: Organization, imagination, and mind. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639042
  28. Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., O’Connor, C., & Haas, A. (2016). School resources in teaching science to diverse student groups: An intervention’s effect on elementary teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27, 769-794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9487-y
  29. Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American educational research journal, 38(1), 97-141. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038001097
  30. Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. K. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.980559
  31. McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026-2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
  32. Mensah, F. M. (2022). “Now, I see”: Multicultural science curriculum as transformation and social action. The Urban Review, 54(1), 155-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-021-00602-5
  33. National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC.
  34. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
  35. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  36. Oceans of Data Institute (2015). Building global interest in data literacy: A dialogue. Waltham, MA: Educational Development Center. Retrieved from oceansofdata.org/ourwork/building-global-interest-data-literacy-dialogue-workshop-report
  37. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
  38. Philip, T. M., Olivares-Pasillas, M. C., & Rocha, J. (2016). Becoming racially literate about data and data-literate about race: Data visualizations in the classroom as a site of racial-ideological micro-contestations. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 361-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1210418
  39. Pieterman-Bos, A., & van Mil, M. H. (2023). Integration of philosophy of science in biomedical data science education to foster better scientific practice. Science & Education, 32(6), 1709-1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00363-x
  40. Rivera Maulucci, M. S. (2010). Resisting the marginalization of science in an urban school: Coactivating social, cultural, material, and strategic resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 840-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20381
  41. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
  42. Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
  43. Stornaiuolo, A. (2020). Authoring data stories in a media makerspace: Adolescents developing critical data literacies. Journal of the learning sciences, 29(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1689365
  44. Thomas, C. A., & Berry III, R. Q. (2019). A qualitative metasynthesis of culturally relevant pedagogy & culturally responsive teaching: Unpacking mathematics teaching practices. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 10(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v10i1.1668
  45. Tissenbaum, M., Weintrop, D., Holbert, N., & Clegg, T. (2021). The case for alternative endpoints in computing education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1164-1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13072
  46. Underwood, J. B., Dickinson, G. K., & Cantu, D. V. (2018). Restructuring teacher preparation with culturally relevant principles. In Outcomes of High-Quality Clinical Practice in Teacher Education (pp. 197).
  47. Vakil, S., & Ayers, R. (2019). The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: Interrogations and explorations. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592831
  48. Wilkerson, M. H., & Polman, J. L. (2020). Situating data science: Exploring how relationships to data shape learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1705664
  49. Wise, A. F. (2020). Educating data scientists and data literate citizens for a new generation of data. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(1), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1705678
  50. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
  51. Yoon, S. A., Shim, J., Miller, K., Cottone, A. M., Noushad, N. F., Yoo, J. U., Gonzalez, M. V., Urbanowicz, R., & Himes, B. E. (2022). Professional development for STEM integration: Analyzing bioinformatics teaching by examining teachers’ qualities of adaptive expertise. In Teacher Learning in Changing Contexts (pp. 69-90). Routledge.
  52. Yoon, S., Yom, J. K., Yang, Z., & Liu, L. (2017). The effects of teachers’ social and human capital on urban science reform initiatives: Considerations for professional development. Teachers College Record, 119(4), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900407
LICENSE
Creative Commons License